Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 53 of 53
  1. #3
    Senior Member Waterdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    The Twilight Zone
    Posts
    2,581
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: West Coaster 152 by Klamath recall

    What’s the alternative? I’m sure they put those floatation boxes there because without them if the boat swamped with the weight of the motor.it would either sink completely or just the tip of the bow would remain above water. I assume there is already floatation under the floor. Do you have any ideas of another way to add sufficient floatation in the stern of the boat?? I’m not trying to hassle you I’m just asking.
    i understand you’d be pissed, and Klamath should not have built the boat without sufficient floatation but if the CG mandates it, it is what it is.
    Last edited by Waterdog; 11-24-2019 at 12:03 PM.
    Hunting, Fishing and Labrador Retrievers and at the end of the day a glass of Buffalo Trace Whiskey- Life is Sweet.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    619
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: West Coaster 152 by Klamath recall

    Id be pissed


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. Likes wckid liked this post
  4. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    45
    Post Thanks / Like

    West Coaster 152 by Klamath recall

    Are there any other owners of West Coaster 152's by Klamath who are dis-satisfied with the way Klamath has chosen to add floation to the boat, which ordered by the USCG as a recall.

    These 'floatation boxes' totatlly alter the rear floor room in the boat......

    Any other owners out there?
    klamrecallpic24nov19.jpg

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •