
Sacramento – On a vote of 6-2 that fell along party lines, the California Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee on August 12 approved Assembly Bill 3030, despite overwhelming opposition from the sportfishing community. The bill now moves on to the Senate Appropriations Committee, according to a press release from the Coastal Conservation Association of California.
The bill needed at least five votes to pass through committee, and the swing votes were cast by California Senators Ben Hueso (D-San Diego) and Bob Hertzberg (D-Van Nuys). With six Democrats in favor and two Republicans opposed, the bill moves on.
The opposition testimony, including phone-in comments, lasted more than an hour and a half, with hundreds of individuals and businesses representing the sportfishing community voicing their opposition to the measure.
“We sincerely thank everyone who called in to voice opposition to the bill,” said Wayne Kotow, Executive Director of the Coastal Conservation Association of California, which is leading the sportfishing community’s charge in opposition to the bill. Kotow testified in person before the committee today.
“We might have lost this battle, but we must continue to fight,” Kotow said. “We will have two more chances to oppose the bill in the Senate Appropriations Committee hearing and, if it gets through that committee, on the Senate floor.”
What started as an international environmental plan to restrict the use of 30 percent of all land and water is now being driven to the extreme here in California with an ocean focus on additional marine protected areas with the bill.
Aside from pushing for marine protected areas, the bill has several other problems, according to Kotow. These include:
- This bill lacks clarity. It uses the term “protection” but does not specify what exactly that means. As written, it’s so vague that many other industries also fear its implementation, including agriculture, the building industry, home builders, county government, water agencies, and wind farming.