
Commission moves forward with plan to postpone MPA assessments
On April 13, the California Fish and Game Commission moved forward with a controversial final Marine Protected Area Master Plan that postpones environmental assessments from every 5 years, as originally promised, to every 10 years.
In what the California Sportfishing League described as a stunning admission, the Commission at its meeting in Santa Rosa introduced the possibility that recreational fishing may never return to California’s coastal waters designated as so-called marine reserves under the privately-funded Marine Life Protection Act Initiative.
The three current members of the commission - President Eric Sklar, Vice President Jacque Hostler-Carmesin, and Member Anthony C. Williams - voted unanimously to approve the plan at its June meeting, in spite of the objection of California anglers and conservationists.
The Commission failed to acknowledge that the alleged Yosmites of the Sea created under the Marine Life Protection Act Initiative are in reality faux marine protected areas, crafted under the helm of a Big Oil lobbyist, that fail to protect the ocean from pollution, fracking, oil drilling, corporate aquaculture, military testing and all human impacts on the ocean other than sustainable fishing and gathering.
The state’s failure to study Marine Protected Areas in a timely fashion is having a profound impact on communities that depend on recreational fishing for outdoor tourism and jobs, said Marko Mlikotin executive director of the California Sportfishing League in a news release. It is evident that Marine Protected Areas that were once viewed as marine restoration projects are becoming permanent fishing bans.
CSL, a nonprofit coalition of fresh and saltwater anglers and small business owners devoted to protecting access to recreational fishing, said that in order to assure California anglers that MPA fishing bans would not become permanent, the state promised that environmental assessments would be conducted every five years so that if fishing populations were restored, so would recreational fishing.
In a stunning admission, newly appointed commissioners rejected the notion that any such commitment was ever made and that marine restoration programs were never intended to restore recreational fishing to coastal waters designated as Marine Reserves, according to the group. The president of the commission, Eric Sklar,