
It’s was more than 40 years ago, but for some reason I remember the comment like the conversation took place yesterday. I was probably 7 years old and my dad was talking about hunting over a cup of coffee with Bill Elliot, a family friend and rural café owner up in Tehama County.
Bill was an old man at the time. He’d been a logger and mechanic and was a lifelong angler and hunter. Bill wasn’t an educated man, but he was ripe with life experience and insight.
“Hell, long before your boy is my age hunting and fishing in California will be the sports of rich men. That is if hunting and fishing are even allowed to continue,” Bill said nodding toward me.
Those words stuck with me. Bill is long dead, but every year his prediction takes on more weight as I watch the quality of hunting and fishing available in California decline.
As if this weren’t bad enough, the rights of California’s anglers and hunters have been steadily legislated away and the cost of engaging in these sports has soared as a result of both regulations and legislation that makes participation in hunting and fishing more and more costly.
Now, I’m going to end up talking about a dark cloud that is now looming over fishing in our state, but before I move forward I need to offer a bit of background.
As most of you know, I’m an avid hunter. I know some of my readers are hunters and shooters, but many are not, so I want to explain something that has taken place in the world of California hunting.
In 2007 Assembly Bill 821 established a Condor Zone in Central California where lead ammo could no longer be used for hunting big game. The ban was based on a study at UC Santa Cruz that indicated that California condors were dying because they were eating lead particles in big game kills.
Fast forward to 2010 and we learned that the so-called science offered up by UC Santa Cruz was an utter lie. The only condors with lead in their systems got