
Over 200 Delta residents, including family farmers, anglers, environmental justice advocates, homeowners, business owners, and elected officials, converged on Sacramento on Friday, April 28, to show their strong opposition to Delta Plan amendments that push Governor Jerry Brown’s Twin Tunnels as the preferred alternative for new Delta Conveyance.
During the public comment period, every speaker except one slammed the Delta Tunnels project for its multitude of flaws. The only person who spoke in support of the current Delta Plan amendments was a representative of the California Department of Water Resources.
The Delta Reform Act of 2009 created the controversial Delta Stewardship Council with the mandate of implementing the co-equal goals of providing a more reliable water supply for California and protecting, restoring, and enhancing the Delta ecosystem.
Formerly chaired by Capitol political insider Phil Isenberg, who also chaired the Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Blue Ribbon Task Force to create so-called marine protected areas on the Central Coast and the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force, the Council is currently chaired by Randy Fiorini, who presided over the meeting.
Members of the Stockton-based Restore the Delta, the Save the California Delta Alliance out of Discovery Bay, North Delta Cares, and other Delta and environmental groups said the proposed amendments lack basic analytical documentation, such as a needs assessment for the California WaterFix, a water supply analysis, and cost-benefits analysis.
They also criticized the proposed amendments for failing to consider environmental justice, anti-discrimination, and human right to water issues in their planning and scientific documentation.
Bob Wright, counsel for Friends of the River, criticized the Council for putting the proverbial cart before the horse by including the Delta Tunnels as the preferred alternative in the Delta Plan.
The Delta Plan should be done as a whole. Conveyance is the last piece of the puzzle, not first, he emphasized.