
Yesterday Governor Gavin Newsom unveiled what he describes as a comprehensive solution for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta through a series of voluntary agreements in an opinion piece at Cal Matters.
In the tradition of the failed CalFed, Delta Vision, Bay Delta Conservation Plan and California Water Fix processes, Newsom presents a new path forward that supposedly engages an array of stakeholders to supposedly resolve their differences, seek common ground and work for the coequal goals of water supply reliability and ecosystem restoration as they move past the old water binaries. Newsom writes:
Historically, disputes over water, or what some call 'water wars,' have pitted stakeholders against one another: urban vs. rural; agriculture vs. conservation; North vs. South.
Today, my administration is proposing a path forward, one that will move past the old water binaries and set us up for a secure and prosperous water future.
Guided by science, this new framework will provide the foundation for binding voluntary agreements between government agencies and water users with partnership and oversight from environmental groups.
These agreements will require adaptive, holistic management of enhanced water flows and habitats to protect, restore, and enhance California’s largest rivers and the Delta.
Newsom claimed that the voluntary agreements will significantly increase the required amount of water flowing through rivers and the Delta. He also touted a historic addition of 60,000 acres of critical habitat and provide certainty to strengthen the health of our economy and our environment.
However, scientists and salmon and Delta advocates say the agreements would be disastrous for fish and wildlife - and are really nothing new.
In a tweet, Dr. Jon Rosenfield, senior scientist for the San Francisco Baykeeper, criticized